Isn't that twisted? Marching for the supposed good of the community etc and then stealing from the innocent bystander!

Or was the vendor innocent? Maybe he was throwing old fruit at the marchers beacause they were getting in the way of his passing customers!

Or maybe he really didnt give a rat, because he was actually paid by another party, with the supposed thives, to stage this little upset... nothing like a bit of drama and anarchy to tipple the voters...

The party / union / organisation never accepts blame, the looters get away with it - as we've seen with last year's security guard and taxi strikes, as we've seen with this year's renaming march, and as we will no doubt see when the civil servant strike takes place. If Frasier-Moloketi and Vavi don't come to some agreement first, of course.
The leadership never sees these incidents, so they always defend their fine, upstanding, card-carrying comrades. they're always indignant that their organisation should be so maligned in the malicious media, who only seek to undermine them anyway.
Fuck 'em. It's lawlessness and it must be met head-on, not with poncy poncy kid gloves.
I'm starting to think that the nutjob with his private army down in Toti has it right. As the Cardigans sing - 'fight fire with fire.'
Time is past for softly softly. Put the motherfuckers in stocks so we can throw rotten tomatos at them outside City Hall.

Usual story hey

No accountability, no cops, no problem, let's all steal

What is unbelievable about it is that they of all people know that the vendors are battling to make a living. Absolute fuckin arseholes. Should stick em in concrete shoes and drop em in the bay with a bag of sardine guts round their necks